I have been a practising astrologer for more than 16 years, specializing in astrology compatibility. Being rather of a technophobe, I’ve mainly prevented the online for much of that time. All very good items must occur to an close however, so in this article I am, now an avid on the net reader and writer. When time permits I read and response concerns on various romantic relationship astrology community forums. Inevitably I study subjects which go like this:
I’m a Leo, am I suitable with an Aquarius?
Reply 1 — indeed!
Solution 2 — no! I’m a Leo and I dated an Aquarius. We break up up.
Response 3 — romance astrology is silly. I put in 172 hrs investigating that every one solar sign mixture has had divorces.
Every of these answers is improper, nevertheless typically just about every will get men and women agreeing with it. On boards wherever votes are solid one particular of these remedy is usually chosen as being proper, and filed away for long term generations of dilemma seekers.
So what’s likely wrong here?
It appears to be like when and where ever astrology compatibility is reviewed on the world wide web that there’s an assumption that sun signs are the key to astrology. I suspect this is mostly due to the drive to simplify, streamline and condense every little thing. Astrology however is a matter in which simplification generally generates difficulties.
The grim actuality is that people today are much a lot more than just their solar signal, and if you want a ‘real’ reply to an astrology question, then you are going to need a real astrology reading through. Heading just by sunlight indications is handy to get a rough concept of what to anticipate, but there are a lot of other planets which can override and trample someone’s solar indicator traits. Each individual particular person and natal chart is exclusive.
This has led to the interesting predicament where by possibly 80% of all data about partnership astrology on the online is fundamentally completely wrong. To qualify that metric, if solar indicators could be looked at in a vacuum, then information and facts would be appropriate. In practice (and people today are asking these types of issue to make authentic lifetime decisions, and not as a hypothetical workout) it really is just not that easy.
One attention-grabbing facet effect of this seems to be a modest army of armchair internet astrologers, handing out parcels of neat and tidy information and facts on all aspects of sunlight indications. Why do they do this? Because the concept of keywords imply that a likely visitor isn’t really going to research for “Aquarius sunshine, Leo moon, Aries mars and many others” – they are likely to look for for “Aquarius” – and woe betide any article which dares to eliminate target by going off subject matter with skills. Anything more complex than that will lead to the browsers back button currently being hit, and very rapidly.
Reasonable sufficient, perhaps this is taking place in all subjects. On the web education is clearly being led by the pupil, and the educators are telling them what they inquire, and not what they need to know. Search engines efficiently pressure internet sites to satisfy the want for fast gratification.
The issue for astrology is that this obsession with sun indicators is degrading the believability of the matter. Folks are appropriate to say “maintain on, I’m a Leo and I will not get along with Sagittarius! This astrology things is worthless!” Are specialist astrologers guilty of this way too? Sure, we are. For the reason that normally, no a single would study our article content! It would be relatively quick even so for astrologers to put a disclaimer or warning when answering posts or creating article content, and perhaps that’s the resolution?
For much more info on astrology compatibility please see http://www.appropriate-astrology.com. Just make positive to browse the disclaimers…